A feeding tube is used when individuals can no longer swallow safely, are lacking essential nutrients, or needs supplements to maintain a completely balanced diet. However, there has been much controversial discussion about whether this is just prolonging the natural course of ones life, if it is a humane way of keeping one alive, and if it is invasive towards an individual.
For those who have the ability to give consent they can choose whether they want to be on a feeding tube or not. But is it appropriate for those who aren’t able to voice their own decision. Usually a next of kin or advance directive is written in order to accommodate wishes an individual has in the future, however how does one decide what is right when there isn’t those orders.
Before making this decision one must consider the benefits and burdens of a feeding device. Tubes can prolong death in otherwise healthy individuals. Many consider it satisyfing knowing that they are providing their loved one with all possible essentials to maintain life with the advancements of technology. Tubing feeding can be safer for someone who has increasing difficulties with dysphasia
Being feed through a tube can be uncomfortable when insertion is performed and diarrhea often occurs. This can increase skin break down and infections. Those individuals who are no longer able to eat anymore pass usually very quickly and painlessly. If there is an underlying disease tubing feeding can prolong the dying process and cause the patient to feel more discomfort and pain. It can also quicken heart failure due to an increase in fluid around the heart.
Ultimately I believe it depends on the individual, the circumstances such as the health of the individual, age, and the family members wishes. An advanced directive and next of kin can ease the decision and allow one to feel at peace that their loved one's preferences are being followed.
http://cbhd.org/content/feeding-tube-dilemma-key-questions
No comments:
Post a Comment